A gay couple in the US who have been praised in the media for their campaigns against ‘homophobia’ are now sentenced to 100 years in prison each. This is after they kept their two adopted sons as sex slaves and offered them to other gay men, the Daily Mail reports.
The gay couple were previously central figures in Georgia's pride scene.
The "married" couple, William Dale Zulock Jr. and Georgia banker Zachary Jacoby Zulock, have been hailed in the media as LGBTQ activists and for their campaigns against "homophobia".
On social media, they frequently posted pictures of the two boys they were allowed to adopt, alongside a lot of LGBTQ propaganda.
The affluent gay couple lived in a luxury villa that police raided in July. The house was decorated with gay symbols and the doormat read: "Gayest Place in Town".
At the same time, the duo regularly raped the boys orally and anally. One of the children was injured after a particularly brutal rape.
The couple's crimes were uncovered after police received a tip from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which traced child pornography to one of the men's Google accounts. A search of their home uncovered more than seven terabytes of digital material documenting the abuse, which appears to have begun when the boys were only three and five years old.
Prosecutor Randy McGinley described the situation as a "real nightmare" and praised the strength of the young victims during the trial. The crimes, which included rape, incest and child pornography, were committed between 2019 and 2021.
But that's not all. The LGBT activists also invited other gay men in the Atlanta area to rape the children, via the gay app Grindr. Two men, Hunter Lawless and Luis Vizcarro-Sanchez, have been sentenced to prison for their involvement.
"Tonight I'm going to fuck my son!" Zachary Jacoby Zulock allegedly wrote in a message to one of the men, and later sent a picture proving that he had done just that.
The two adopted children had previously been taken into care from parents with substance abuse problems. The adoption was done through a now defunct Christian organization, whose poor vetting procedures have been called into question. Although one of the men had previously been accused of raping another child, the couple was still able to proceed with the adoption.
Comments